Volume 30, Issue 2 (summer 2026)                   jwss 2026, 30(2): 165-176 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Naderi Khorasgani M, Ghanavati Behbahani Z, Fattahi R, Samadi Brojeni H. Evaluation of MPSIAC Model and Effects of Land Use Changes on Soil Erosion/Sediment Load in Goharbaran Subbasin, Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari Province. jwss 2026; 30 (2) :165-176
URL: http://jstnar.iut.ac.ir/article-1-4533-en.html
Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran. , khnaderi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (53 Views)
Water erosion is a great issue in Iran, and due to a lack of reliable and sufficient data for the recognition of vulnerable areas, using models is inevitable. This study was designed for the evaluation of the MPSIAC model in the subbasin of Goharbaran in Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province. The sediments of the reservoir were surveyed and measured after exhausting the water. Landsat-8 data were applied to study land use changes on soil erosion. During intensive fieldwork, 37 surficial (0-20 cm) soil samples were collected and, after pretreatment, were used for some soil physical and chemical analyses. For the determination of 9 MPSIAC factors, we used library, field, and laboratory data. Multitemporal analysis showed that the quality of rangelands has increased, and the surface area of orchards was doubled within 20 years (1994-2014). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the MPSIAC model was highly sensitive to the river erosion factor, while the least sensitive factor was soil. The sensitivity of the model to the runoff specific peak and soil silt percentage was also very high. Application of the MPSIAC model showed that 48% of soils were in moderate and 36% of soils were in severe sediment yield rate classes. Results of sediment measurements indicated that the specific sediment yield was 11.76 t.ha-1.y-1 during 26 years (1988-2014), while the forecasted value by the MPSIAC model was 5.97 t.ha-1.y-1 Despite others' findings, a lower estimation of the model revealed the need for MPSIAC model calibration before using it in similar environments.
Full-Text [PDF 634 kb]   (40 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Ggeneral

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Water and Soil Science

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb

تحت نظارت وف ایرانی